Vincent Eugene Flick v. State

In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-20-00039-CR
__________________
VINCENT EUGENE FLICK, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 9th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 19-11-15009-CR
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 5, 2020, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not
apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed
for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for
continuing the appeal. The notice was mailed to appellant’s address of record, but
the post office returned it as undeliverable.
1
The documents provided by the District Clerk do not show that the trial court
has signed an order that is appealable at this time. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d
792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (holding that intermediate appellate courts lack
jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly
granted by law). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 3, 2020
Opinion Delivered March 4, 2020
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
2