Driver Pipeline Company, Inc. v. Claudia Nino, Jesus Espinoza, Jr., Sylvia Espinoza, Jesus Medina Espinoza, Olivia Espinoza, Paula Wyatt, the Wyatt Law Firm

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed March 3, 2020
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-01409-CV
DRIVER PIPELINE COMPANY, INC., Appellant
V.
CLAUDIA NINO, JESUS ESPINOZA, JR., SYLVIA ESPINOZA, JESUS MEDINA
ESPINOZA, OLIVIA ESPINOZA, PAULA WYATT, AND THE WYATT LAW FIRM,
Appellees
On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-01630
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Whitehill, Molberg, and Nowell
Opinion by Justice Whitehill
Seeking to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order denying its motion to reconsider the
dismissal of its claims against appellees under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a, appellant has
filed a petition for permissive appeal. We deny the petition and dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(f); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3, 42.3(a);
Bethel v. Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C., No. 18-0595, 2019 WL 8012729,
*3 (Tex. Feb. 21, 2020).
/Bill Whitehill/
BILL WHITEHILL
JUSTICE
191409F.P05
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
DRIVER PIPELINE COMPANY, INC., On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District
Appellant Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-01630.
No. 05-19-01409-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill,
Justices Molberg and Nowell participating.
CLAUDIA NINO, JESUS ESPINOZA,
JR., SYLVIA ESPINOZA, JESUS
MEDINA ESPINOZA, OLIVIA
ESPINOZA, PAULA WYATT, AND THE
WYATT LAW FIRM, Appellees
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellees Claudia Nino, Jesus Espinoza, Jr., Sylvia Espinoza, Jesus
Medina Espinoza, Olivia Espinoza, Paula Wyatt, and The Wyatt Law Firm recover their costs, if
any, of this appeal from appellant Driver Pipeline Company, Inc.
Judgment entered March 3, 2020
–2–