DocketNumber: No. 10-18-00128-CV
Citation Numbers: 553 S.W.3d 643
Judges: Davis, Gray, Scoggins
Filed Date: 6/6/2018
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/21/2022
On January 23, 2018, the trial court signed an interlocutory order that: (1) declared appellant, John Margetis, a vexatious litigant; (2) required Margetis to post a $10,000 security for the benefit of appellee Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC; and (3)
*644required that Margetis obtain permission from the applicable local administrative judge before filing any additional pro se litigation in the State of Texas. Thereafter, on February 26, 2018, the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. Margetis filed a pro se notice of appeal in the trial court on April 4, 2018, stating that he wished to appeal a "motion to dismiss."
It is well settled that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and interlocutory orders made appealable by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. ,
As stated earlier, the trial court signed the complained-of order on January 23, 2018; however, Margetis did not file his pro se notice of appeal until April 4, 2018-more than twenty days after the trial court signed the complained-of order. Furthermore, it is of no consequence that Margetis requested findings of fact and conclusions of law because the filing of a motion for new trial, any other post-trial motion, or a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law does not extend the time to perfect an accelerated appeal. See
And to the extent that Margetis complains about the trial court's order expunging lis pendens, we note that this is an interlocutory order not made appealable by statute. See, e.g., Smith v. Schwartz , No. 02-15-00146-CV,
As the trial court's January 23, 2018 judgment is the only potentially appealable order in this case, we construe Margetis's pro se notice of appeal as seeking to appeal the trial court's January 23, 2018 judgment. Margetis has not directed us to any motion to dismiss in the record.
In light of our disposition, we dismiss all pending motions as moot.
Zachariah C. Manning v. Dallas Independent School District ( 2021 )
Zachariah C. Manning v. Dallas Independent School District ( 2021 )
Robert Michael Philipps v. Cynthia Jane Jackson and Wade C. ... ( 2021 )
in the Estate of Paris Alfred Mims, Jr. ( 2021 )
Elijah Ratcliff v. Jenkins and Young PC ( 2022 )
Rainer Vnon Falkenhorst III v. Arthur Kwok, Qai Asset, LP, ... ( 2023 )
Mary Louise Serafine v. the Honorable Karin Crump, the ... ( 2023 )