Joseph Lee Hill v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-19-00722-CR
Joseph Lee Hill, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
NO. 79438, THE HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Joseph Lee Hill was indicted for the first-degree felony offense of
aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than fourteen, committed against his friend’s
daughter, A.P. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.021(a)(1)(B) (defining offense), (e) (providing that
offense is first-degree felony). The jury heard testimony that when A.P. was four or five years
old, Hill drove A.P. to playdates with another friend’s child but stopped at Hill’s residence
beforehand and sexually assaulted A.P., including one incident when he penetrated A.P.’s sexual
organ with his. Hill testified at trial and denied A.P.’s accusations against him. However, one of
Hill’s own witnesses testified that she did not think A.P. “was lying about anything” and that
A.P.’s mother “didn’t fabricate this story” or coach A.P. “to come up with this.”
At the conclusion of trial, the jury convicted Hill of the first-degree felony as
charged in the indictment. The district court assessed Hill’s punishment at twenty-five years’
imprisonment. See id. § 12.32(a) (providing punishment range of five to ninety-nine years or life
imprisonment for first-degree felony offense). Hill appealed his judgment of conviction.
Hill’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a
brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements
of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the
record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie
v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684, 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553, 553
(Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Hill’s
attorney certified that she provided Hill with copies of the motion to withdraw and brief, advised
him of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief, and provided him with
a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record along with this Court’s mailing address.
See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at
744; Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). The Bell County District
Clerk notified this Court that a copy of the appellate record was sent to Hill by certified mail on
June 3, 2020. Hill filed multiple motions requesting extensions of time to file his pro se brief,
which were granted until November 19, 2020. However, the time to file the brief has expired
and no pro se brief was filed.1
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S.
at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App.
2005). We agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous and grant her motion to withdraw.
1
Hill filed a fifth motion for extension of time, which is denied.
2
We affirm the district court’s judgment of conviction.
__________________________________________
Jeff Rose, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana
Affirmed
Filed: December 2, 2020
Do Not Publish
3