Jeffrey Michael Wineberg v. the State of Texas

Order entered March 11, 2022
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-00668-CR
JEFFREY MICHAEL WINEBERG, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 366-83346-2020
ORDER
Before the Court is appellant’s March 8, 2022 pro se “Motion in Request for
Production of Documents Pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article(s)
24.02 and 24.03.” The law is well-settled that appellant, who is represented by
counsel on appeal, is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Scheanette v. State,
144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (appellant has no right to hybrid
representation on appeal); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App.
1995) (declining to address issues raised in supplemental brief filed by appellant
pro se when he was already represented by counsel); Miniel v. State, 831 S.W.2d
310, 313 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (same); Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625
(Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981) (appellant is not entitled to hybrid
representation); Landers v. State, 550 S.W.2d 272, 280 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977)
(op. on reh’d) (same). Therefore, we DENY his pro se motion.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to Jeffrey Michael
Wineberg, TDCJ# 02357342, Coffield Unit, 2661 FM 2054, Tennessee Colony,
TX 75884, in addition to counsel for all parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE