Ex Parte Verdell Brown, Jr.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00580-CR
Ex parte Verdell Brown, Jr.
FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
NO. 71473-A, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Verdell Brown, Jr., an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, filed a
post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure that was subsequently denied by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
(CCA) without written order. See Tex. Code Crim. App. art. 11.07. Brown seeks to appeal the
CCA’s denial as well as the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court with
respect to the application.
Article 11.07 provides the exclusive remedy for post-conviction relief from a
felony conviction in which the applicant seeks relief from a judgment imposing a penalty other
than death. See id. The article vests complete jurisdiction over such relief with the CCA. See
id., at §§ 3, 5. “While a post-conviction application for writ of habeas relief under article 11.07
must be filed in the court of original conviction, that court does not decide the merits of the
application, but simply makes any necessary findings of fact and forwards the record to the
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for a final ruling.” Ex parte Taylor, No. 03-16-00461-CR,
2016 WL 6407301, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 28, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated
for publication).
Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction over criminal-law matters pertaining to
proceedings under article 11.07. See In re Garcia, 363 S.W.3d 819, 822 n.4 (Tex. App.—Austin
2012, no pet.) (“Courts of appeals have no jurisdiction over criminal-law matters pertaining to
proceedings under article 11.07.”); In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196–97 (Tex. App.—Houston
[14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (observing intermediate appellate courts lack jurisdiction
over “post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases” under article 11.07). We therefore
lack jurisdiction to review the CCA’s denial of Brown’s application for writ of habeas corpus
or to review the convicting court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Taylor,
2016 WL 6407301, at *1. Brown’s appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
App. P. 43.2(f).
__________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: March 16, 2022
Do Not Publish
2