Marta Danylyk, Helmut Hofer, and Sofija Hofer v. City of Euless, Self-Insured

DISMISS and Opinion Filed March 18, 2022
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-01074-CV
MARTA DANYLYK, HELMUT HOFER, AND SOFIJA HOFER, Appellants
V.
CITY OF EULESS, SELF-INSURED, Appellee
On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 366-01243-2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein
Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
Seeking to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their plea to the
jurisdiction, appellants have filed a petition for permissive appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 28.3.
After considering the petition, response, and reply, we deny the petition and
dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.
§ 51.014(f); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Feagan v. Wilson, No. 11-21-00032-CV, 2021
WL 1134804, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Eastland Mar. 25, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.).
/Robert D. Burns, III/
ROBERT D. BURNS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE
211074F.P05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
MARTA DANYLYK, HELMUT On Appeal from the 366th Judicial
HOFER, AND SOFIJA HOFER, District Court, Collin County, Texas
Appellants Trial Court Cause No. 366-01243-
2017.
No. 05-21-01074-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice
Burns, Justices Molberg and
CITY OF EULESS, SELF- Goldstein participating.
INSURED, Appellee
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee City of Euless, Self-Insured recover its costs, if
any, of this appeal from appellants Marta Danylyk, Helmut Hofer, and Sofija Hofer.
Judgment entered March 18, 2022
–3–