in Re Danielle Sposito

Deny and Opinion issued March 22, 2022
In the
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-01171-CV
IN RE DANIELLE SPOSITO, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 417th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 417-53396-2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle
Opinion by Justice Carlyle
Before the Court are relator’s January 19, 2022 redacted petition for writ of
mandamus and the record filed in support; December 30, 2021 and January 31, 2022
emergency motions for temporary relief; February 7, 2022 motion for appointment
of a new judge in her Collin County Case and accompanying emergency motion for
temporary relief; and March 10, 2022 emergency motion to expedite petition of writ
of mandamus and appointment of a new trial court judge.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude relator has failed
to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition
for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
We deny relator’s pending motions.
211171f.p05
/s/Cory L. Carlyle_____
CORY L. CARLYLE
JUSTICE
–2–