Ex Parte Gabriel Alexander Bittner

In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-20-00372-CR
No. 07-20-00373-CR
EX PARTE GABRIEL ALEXANDER BITTNER, APPELLANT
On Appeal from the 84th District Court
Hutchinson County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 12,391, 12,498, Honorable Curt Brancheau, Presiding
September 27, 2021
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Gabriel Alexander Bittner, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his
request to release him on a personal recognizance bond or reduce the amount of his
bond. Because appellant subsequently pleaded guilty to one of the underlying offenses
and the other offense has been dismissed, we dismiss the appeal.
On December 17, 2019, appellant was charged by indictment for the offense of
burglary of a habitation in cause numbers 12,391 and 12,392. Appellant was arrested
and bond was set at $50,000 on each charge. The trial court reduced the bond to $10,000
following a hearing. The State filed motions to revoke bond alleging that appellant had
violated the bond conditions. After appellant failed to appear at the April 1, 2020 hearing
on the State’s motions, the surety on the bonds surrendered the bonds and a warrant for
appellant’s arrest was issued.
Appellant was arrested on the warrant on April 15, 2020. On May 28, 2020,
appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus seeking bail, which the trial court
denied. On June 23, the State re-indicted cause number 12,392 into cause number
12,498, adding counts for aggravated assault and burglary of a building. Bond was
denied. The indictment in cause number 12,392 was later dismissed. On October 1,
2020, appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus seeking release due to delay.
See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 17.151 (West Supp. 2020). After the trial court
denied appellant’s request for relief, appellant brought this appeal contending that the trial
court’s denial was an abuse of discretion.
On March 23, 2021, appellant pleaded guilty to the underlying offense of burglary
of a habitation in cause number 12,498 and was sentenced to eight years’ confinement
in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant waived his right of appeal and the
trial court certified that appellant has no right to appeal. In conjunction with appellant’s
plea, the State dismissed cause number 12,391.
Issues regarding pretrial bail are moot when the accused is no longer subject to
pretrial confinement. See Martinez v. State, 826 S.W.2d 620, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)
(en banc). Thus, appellant’s guilty plea in cause number 12,498 and the State’s dismissal
of cause number 12,391 render the trial court’s ruling on the application for writ of habeas
corpus moot.
2
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot.
Judy C. Parker
Justice
Do not publish.
3