DocketNumber: WR-92,469-01
Filed Date: 4/21/2021
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/26/2021
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,469-01 EX PARTE CALEB PATRICK BERNAL, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F42292-B IN THE 18TH DISTRICT COURT FROM JOHNSON COUNTY YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J., joined. DISSENTING OPINION Applicant, Caleb Patrick Bernal, was convicted of online solicitation of a minor in violation of former Section 33.021(b) of the Penal Code in 2008. TEX. PENAL CODE § 33.021(b). He was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this writ of habeas corpus contending that the statute under which he was convicted was found unconstitutional. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. Applicant’s sentence has since discharged; however, he contends that he is suffering collateral consequences due to his conviction. Today, the Court grants Applicant post-conviction relief based on Ex parte Lo, in which the Court held Subsection (b) of the former online solicitation of a minor statute to BERNAL — 2 be unconstitutional. See Ex parte Lo,424 S.W.3d 10
(Tex. Crim. App. 2013). As Applicant has not demonstrated that his conduct constituted protected speech such that the statute may be said to have operated unconstitutionally as applied to him, I disagree with the granting of relief. I therefore dissent from the Court’s order granting summary post- conviction habeas corpus relief for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinions in Ex parte Fournier,473 S.W.3d 789
, 800–805 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015) (Yeary, J., dissenting), and Ex parte Chavez,542 S.W.3d 583
, 584–85 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018) (Yeary, J., dissenting). FILED: April 21, 2021 DO NOT PUBLISH