DocketNumber: 27710
Citation Numbers: 282 S.W.2d 876, 162 Tex. Crim. 132, 1955 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1571
Judges: Davidson
Filed Date: 10/19/1955
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Howze & Howze, by Murray J. Howze, Monahans, for appellant.
Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
DAVIDSON, Judge.
This is a conviction for forgery, with punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.
Under the statute, Art. 979, P.C., an essential element of the crime of forgery is the making "without lawful authority" of a false instrument in writing, purporting to be the act of another, with the intent to injury or defraud.
The instant indictment contains no allegation that the check described therein, which upon its face purported to be the act of another, was made "without lawful authority".
The absence of such allegation renders the indictment fatally defective. Branch's P.C., Sec. 1403, p. 856; Willson's Criminal Forms, No. 430; Pye v. State, 71 Tex. Crim. 94, 154 S.W. 222.
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.
Landry v. State , 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1560 ( 1979 )
Ex Parte Porter , 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 58 ( 1992 )
Minix v. State , 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1303 ( 1979 )
Kulhanek v. State , 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1659 ( 1979 )