RODRIGUEZ, HUMBERTO Jr.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-81,853-01
EX PARTE HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZ, JR., Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. CR-0403-00-A IN THE 92ND DISTRICT COURT
FROM HIDALGO COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
The prior opinion is withdrawn. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for
a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant
was convicted of one count of capital murder and one count of aggravated kidnapping. He was
sentenced to life imprisonment for the capital murder and twenty-eight years’ imprisonment for the
aggravated kidnapping. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals upheld the aggravated kidnapping
conviction, but reversed the capital murder conviction on the basis that jurisdiction was not proper
in Texas, because the killing took place in Mexico. Rodriguez v. State, No. 13-00-771-CR (Tex.
App. – Corpus Christi, August 14, 2003). The State petitioned this Court for discretionary review,
2
and this Court reversed the judgment of the court of appeals as to the capital murder conviction, and
remanded to that court for further action. Rodriguez v. State, No. 1568-03 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).
On remand, the Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. Rodriguez v. State,
No., 13-00-771-CR (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi 2007).
Applicant contends, among other things,1 that his convictions for both aggravated kidnapping
and capital murder for murder in the course of an aggravated kidnapping violate the prohibition on
double jeopardy. The trial court has determined that Applicant’s convictions in both counts violate
the prohibition on double jeopardy. Relief is granted. The judgment in Count Two of Cause No.
CR-0403-00-A in the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County is vacated.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Delivered: January 21, 2015
Do not publish
1
This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit.