DocketNumber: 05-18-00053-CR
Filed Date: 6/7/2018
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/11/2018
CHIEF JUSTICE LISA MATZ CAROLYN WRIGHT CLERK OF THE COURT (214) 712-3450 JUSTICES theclerk@5th.txcourts.gov DAVID L. BRIDGES MOLLY FRANCIS GAYLE HUMPA DOUGLAS S. LANG BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS (214) 712-3434 ROBERT M. FILLMORE gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov LANA MYERS Court of Appeals DAVID EVANS FACSIMILE ADA BROWN Fifth District of Texas at Dallas (214) 745-1083 CRAIG STODDART 600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200 BILL WHITEHILL INTERNET DAVID J. SCHENCK DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/5THCOA.ASPX JASON BOATRIGHT (214) 712-3400 March 15, 2018 Honorable Jeanine Howard Presiding Judge Criminal District Court No. 6 Frank Crowley Courts Building 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-11 Dallas, TX 75207 RE: Court of Appeals Numbers: 05-18-00053-CR, 05-18-00054-CR, 05-18-00055-CR & 05-18-00056-CR Trial Court Case Numbers: F17-45821-X, F17-45822-X, F17-45823-X & F17-45824-X Style: Carlos Manuel Rivera v. The State of Texas Dear Judge Howard: After reviewing the records in the above appeals, the Court notes that the trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right to appeal incorrectly state appellant is not entitled to appeal his convictions. Specifically, each certification states appellant waived his right to appeal. The records show appellant pleaded open to each offense, i.e., he pleaded guilty without the benefit of a plea bargain. On the forms marked “Plea Agreement,” the box indicating appellant waived his right to appeal was checked in cause numbers F17-45822-X, F17-45823-X & F17-45824-X (court of appeal numbers 05-18-00054-CR, 05-18-00055-CR & 05-18-00056- CR); the box was not checked in cause number F17-45821-X (appellate cause #05-18-00053- CR). However, the records also show that the waivers of his right to appeal in cause numbers F17-45822-X, F17-45823-X & F17-45824-X were executed before the trial court found him guilty, they were not bargained for, and there was no recommended sentence in any of the cases. Under these circumstances, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has determined an appellant’s waiver of his right to appeal is not knowing and intelligent and does not bar him from appealing his convictions. See Ex parte Delaney,207 S.W.3d 794
, 798-800 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Because the records show appellant has not waived his right to appeal in any of these cases, please file, within TEN DAYS of the date of the letter, a corrected certification of appellant’s right to appeal that accurately reflects appellant has the right to appeal in each of the above cases. We appreciate your attention to this matter. Respectfully, /s/ Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court LM/cg 2