Hill v. State

WOODLEY, Judge.

The same question is raised here as in Tex.Cr.R., 297 S.W.2d 679, and Tex.Cr.R., 297 S.W.2d 680, this day decided contrary to appellant’s contention, the sole difference being that here the plea of guilty was for possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a wet area without a permit, an offense likewise defined in art. 666-4(a), V.A.P.C.

The judgment is affirmed.