DocketNumber: No. 28755
Citation Numbers: 299 S.W.2d 139
Judges: Davidson, Woodley
Filed Date: 1/16/1957
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/1/2021
The same question is raised here as in Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 297 S.W.2d 679, this day decided contrary to appellant’s contention, the sole difference being that here the plea of guilty was for possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a wet area without a permit, an offense likewise defined in art. 666-4 (a), V.A.P.C., and punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.
The judgment is affirmed.