DocketNumber: WR-36,636-02
Filed Date: 1/30/2019
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/31/2019
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-36,636-02 EX PARTE GERALD LYNN SIMIEN, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W17-71394-P (A) IN THE 203RD DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young,418 S.W.2d 824
, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal his conviction or sentence. In this application, Applicant alleges that he was incompetent to enter a plea, that his indictment was fundamentally defective, that he was denied an examining trial, that he is not being properly credited with pre-sentencing jail time, and that his trial counsel was ineffective. Applicant's claim concerning the denial of pre-sentencing jail time credits is dismissed. Ex 2 parte Ybarra,149 S.W.3d 147
(Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (Where an inmate seeks pre-sentence jail time credit, "[t]he appropriate remedy in this situation is to require Applicant to present the issue to the trial court by way of a nunc pro tunc motion, . . . [and] [i]f the trial court fails to respond, Applicant is first required to seek relief in the Court of Appeals, by way of a petition for a writ of mandamus, unless there is a compelling reason not to do ."). Applicant’s remaining claims are without merit, and are denied. Filed: January 30, 2019 Do not publish