Tyson, Herschel Steven

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-89,276-01
EX PARTE HERSCHEL STEVEN TYSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 2016F00036 IN THE 5th DISTRICT COURT
FROM CASS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unlawful
possession of a firearm by a felon and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal
his conviction.
Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because he was not made aware that the
prior felony conviction upon which this offense was based was unavailable because the order setting
aside his prior felony conviction released him from all penalties and disabilities resulting from that
conviction. Cuellar v. State, 70 S.W.3d 815 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). The trial court, with the
2
agreement of the State, recommends that relief be granted.
The trial court’s findings are supported by the record, but we must first address the fact that
the habeas corpus application before us is not compliant with TEX . R. APP . P. 73.1 in any way.1
However, because the record clearly shows Applicant is entitled to relief, we exercise our
jurisdiction and grant relief. Ex parte Golden, 991 S.W.2d 859 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).
Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 2016F00036 in the 5th District Court of Cass
County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Cass County to
answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench
warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Delivered: January 9, 2019
Do not publish
1
It should be noted that Applicant is represented by habeas counsel in this application.
We would remind counsel to consult the appropriate statutes and rules before filing any habeas
corpus applications in the future.