DocketNumber： AP-75,282
Filed Date： 10/26/2005
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/15/2015
These are post-conviction applications for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this Court pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. Applicant was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon, habitual, and possession of more than one gram of methamphetamine, habitual, and punishment was assessed at life and seventy-five years imprisonment. These convictions were affirmed. Keagan v. State, Nos. 02-03-024-CR & 02-03-025-CR (Tex. App. -- Fort Worth, delivered February 19, 2004, no pet.).
Applicant contends, inter alia, that he was denied an opportunity to file a petition for discretionary review because his appellate attorney did not timely notify him that his conviction had been affirmed or that he could seek discretionary review, pro se. The trial court, based upon an affidavit from appellate counsel, recommended that relief be granted. The record reflects that counsel did not timely inform Applicant that he could file a petition for discretionary review after his convictions were affirmed on appeal.
Habeas corpus relief is granted, in part, and Applicant is granted an opportunity to file out-of-time petitions for discretionary review from his convictions in cause numbers 14874 & 14875 from the 43rd Judicial District Court of Parker County. Applicant is ordered returned to the point at which he may file petitions for discretionary review. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the Court of Appeals' decision had been rendered on the day the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to seek discretionary review, he must take affirmative steps to see that his petitions are filed in the Court of Appeals within thirty days of the date the mandate of this Court has issued.
Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
DELIVERED: October 26, 2005
DO NOT PUBLISH