DocketNumber： AP-75,616
Filed Date： 2/14/2007
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/15/2015
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
Applicant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because she failed to investigate the circumstances of Applicant's arrest and confession and because she failed to file a motion to suppress. In a separate ground, Applicant contends that the State breached the plea agreement.
On September 27, 2006, we remanded the application and instructed the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing. After holding a hearing, the trial court found that counsel failed to fully investigate the circumstances of Applicant's arrest. In light of counsel's failure to investigate, the trial court concluded that Applicant probably would not have been convicted based on the present legally admissible evidence. With respect to the plea agreement, the trial court concluded that there was no breach of the agreement. The trial court recommended granting relief.
We agree. Based on the record, counsel's failure to investigate the circumstances of Applicant's arrest and confession and to file a motion to suppress constituted deficient performance. Applicant, as a result, was prejudiced. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984). Accordingly, relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 26,669 in the 13th District Court of Navarro County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Navarro County to answer the charges against him.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division.
Delivered: February 14, 2007
Do Not Publish