Turcios, Juan Francisco

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-83,155-02
EX PARTE JUAN FRANCISCO TURCIOS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. W11-70896-P(A) IN THE 203RD DISTRICT COURT
FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated
assault and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Turcios v. State, 05-12-00840-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 7, 2013) (not designated for
publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance.
The trial court entered an order designating issues, and the Dallas County District Clerk forwarded
2
this application because the trial court did not make findings of fact and conclusions of law within
181 days of the State’s receipt of this application. TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(5).
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. The trial
court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
After reviewing counsel’s response, the trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions
of law as to whether counsel’s conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court
shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and
appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: July 29, 2015
Do not publish