DocketNumber: No. 2140.
Citation Numbers: 53 S.W. 851, 41 Tex. Crim. 286, 1899 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 191
Judges: Davidsoh, Hehdebsotst
Filed Date: 11/29/1899
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/15/2024
While I concur in the disposition of the case made by Judge DAVIDSON, I will state more fully my views:
The conviction was general, and, if the proof justified, it could be maintained under either the first or fourth count of the indictment. It is conceded the prosecutrix was under 15 years of age, and was not the wife of appellant. The evidence tends to show that he made an assault on her; that is, he put his hands on her without her consent, evidently with intent to persuade her to copulate with him. She not only refused, but resisted his attempt, and thereupon he desisted. Unquestionably *Page 288
there was lacking here that sufficient force establishing the intent of appellant to copulate with prosecutrix without her consent which is required by law. As was said in Dockery v. State, 35 Texas Criminal Reports, 487: "To constitute the offense of an assault with intent to rape, it must appear from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused intended, if it became necessary, to force compliance with his desires at all events, regardless of any resistance made by his victim." And see Pefferling v. State,