DocketNumber: No. 5032.
Citation Numbers: 203 S.W. 766, 83 Tex. Crim. 375, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 194
Judges: Morrow
Filed Date: 5/8/1918
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/15/2024
Relator applied for a writ of habeas corpus seeking discharge from an order of the county judge of Bexar County adjudging him guilty of contempt. The order permitting the application to be filed was on the theory that the judgment was entered in a proceeding under the juvenile delinquency Act. Vernon's Texas C.C.P., p. 985, title 17. This Act has been construed criminal in its nature. Ex parte McLoud, 200 S.W. Rep., 394; Ex parte Pruett, 200 S.W. Rep., 392; Miller v. State, 200 S.W. Rep., 389; McLaren v. State, 82 Tex.Crim. Rep.. Since the application has been supplemented by the facts it appears that the proceeding grew out of a controversy over the custody of a dependent or neglected child. See Vernon's Civil Statutes, vol. 2, title 38, chap. 1, arts. 2184 to 2190, inclusive. *Page 376
Proceedings under this statute we regard as civil in their nature. Instances are numerous in which this has been declared. See cases cited in Miller v. State, 200 S.W. Rep., 389, motion for rehearing; Ex parte Singleton, 72 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Ex parte Reed, 34 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Legate v. Legate,
We therefore decline to issue the writ of habeas corpus and remand the relator to the respondent, John W. Tobin, sheriff of Bexar County, without in any way prejudicing relator's privilege of pursuing his remedy by habeas corpus or otherwise in the civil courts having jurisdiction.
Writ declined.