DocketNumber: No. 7681.
Citation Numbers: 252 S.W. 509, 95 Tex. Crim. 1
Judges: LATTIMORE, JUDGE.
Filed Date: 4/25/1923
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Morris County of a conspiracy to commit a felony, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.
There is but one bill of exceptions in the record which contends that the indictment was insufficient for not alleging that appellant and his co-conspirators did not have a legal permit authorizing them to manufacture intoxicating liquor. We deem the contention without merit, and have held that if one manufactures intoxicating liquor for one of the excepted purposes, the fact that he has no permit does not penalize him. Burciago v. State, 88 Tex.Crim. Rep.; White v. State,
There seems no question of the purpose of appellant to unlawfully manufacture intoxicating liquor. The State's case shows beyond question that he and others were engaged in preparation for such manufacture, carried to the point of putting in place and getting ready the instruments and machinery for same. Appellant testified admitting his own preparation for such manufacture and purpose so to engage, but denying participation therein by an other person. The evidence offered on behalf of the State justified the conclusion of the jury that other persons were so engaged with him in such preparation and their further conclusion of a conspiracy to perform the act made a felony by the statute.
Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affrmed.
Affirmed.