DocketNumber: WR-85,573-02
Filed Date: 11/16/2016
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/18/2016
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,573-02 EX PARTE CLINT WELDON WILSON, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F8775 IN THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FRANKLIN COUNTY ALCALA , J., filed a concurring opinion. CONCURRING OPINION I join this Court’s remand order because I agree with its observation that applicant has alleged facts that, “if true, might entitle him to relief.” Because applicant has pleaded a colorable ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, I would order the habeas court on remand to appoint counsel for him upon request if he is indigent, regardless of whether the trial court holds a hearing. See Ex parte Pointer,492 S.W.3d 318
, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (per curiam) (Alcala, J., concurring). At a minimum, however, in addition to the order’s current admonition that the appointment of counsel is mandatory for an indigent applicant upon request if the habeas court holds a hearing, I would include a further admonishment that an indigent applicant is “entitled” to the appointment of counsel upon request “if the court concludes that the interests of justice require representation.” See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. ART . 1.051(d). Filed: November 16, 2016 Do Not Publish