Dotson, Richard

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-74,562-02
EX PARTE RICHARD DOTSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 1192825-B IN THE 177TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of possession of less than one gram of a controlled substance and
sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Dotson v. State, No. 14-09-00213-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 27, 2010)
(not designated for publication). Applicant filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus followed
by an amended writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded
them to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that trial and appellate counsel were ineffective because they did not
challenge the validity of an enhancement allegation that was used to enhance punishment in this
case. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
2
466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate
forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The record contains an
unsworn declaration from appellate counsel. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to
Applicant’s claim. If necessary, the trial court shall order appellate counsel to provide a supplemental
affidavit. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).
It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall
determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If
Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, based on the
prevailing law at the time of the trial, trial and appellate counsels’ performance was deficient and
Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall make specific findings determining whether either
of the prior convictions alleged as enhancements in this case were punishable as state jail felonies,
but enhanced to a higher range of punishment. The trial court may make any other findings and
conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
3
Filed: October 6, 2021
Do not publish