Stroman, Marty Joe

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-58,188-02
EX PARTE MARTY JOE STROMAN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 12309-B IN THE 115TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM UPSHUR COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to eighteen years’
imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Stroman v. State, No. 06-00-
00198-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana Mar. 28, 2001) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed
this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied time credit while he was
restrained under authority of a pre-revocation warrant. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might
entitle him to relief. Ex parte Canada, 754 S.W.2d 660, 668 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Accordingly,
the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX .
2
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of
relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07,
§ 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel
to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or
retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The response shall state whether Applicant presented a claim to the time credit resolution
system of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and, if so, the date the claim was presented. The
response shall then state whether Applicant was held under authority of a pre-revocation warrant
before his parole was revoked. If so, the response shall state the date the warrant was executed and
the date Applicant’s parole was revoked. The response shall state whether Applicant is receiving
time credits for time spent in confinement pursuant to the execution of a pre-revocation warrant, and
shall provide details of time credits applied to his sentence.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, before filing
this application, Applicant properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required by §
501.0081(b) of the Government Code. The trial court shall then determine whether Applicant is
entitled to credit for time spent in confinement after execution of a pre-revocation warrant and, if so,
whether he is receiving the proper credit for that time. The trial court may make any other findings
and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
3
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: December 18, 2019
Do not publish