DocketNumber: WR-85,310-01
Filed Date: 4/12/2017
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2017
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,310-01 EX PARTE THOMAS LITTLE, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 14-0698-CR-C-A IN THE 25TH DISTRICT COURT FROM GUADALUPE COUNTY Per curiam. KEASLER , J., filed a dissenting opinion in which KELLER , P.J., joined. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young,418 S.W.2d 824
, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty years’ imprisonment. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Little v. State, No. 04-14-00618-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Oct. 7, 2015). The State alleged in Count One of the indictment that Applicant entered the victim’s habitation without consent and with intent to kidnap a child in her custody, which is a first-degree 2 felony. It alleged in Count Two that he entered the victim’s habitation without consent and with intent to commit theft, which is a second-degree felony. The jury convicted Applicant of both counts and assessed two twenty-year sentences. Applicant contends, inter alia, that his two convictions violate double jeopardy. See Ex parte Cavazos,203 S.W.3d 333
, 337 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). This Court has held that burglary is a crime against property.Id. “[W]hen a
burglary is committed, the harm results from the entry itself. [] The offense is complete once the unlawful entry is made, without regard to whether the intended theft or felony is also completed.”Id. Thus, this
Court held, “[T]he allowable unit of prosecution in a burglary is the unlawful entry. [A habeas applicant’s] convictions violate double jeopardy [when] he was punished multiple times for a single unlawful entry.”Id. Applicant is
entitled to habeas relief. The conviction for burglary of a habitation in count two of the judgment in cause no. 14-0698-CR-C from the 25th District Court of Guadalupe County is vacated. The conviction for burglary of a habitation in count one of the judgment remains unaffected. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Delivered: April 12, 2017 Do not publish