DocketNumber: 45784
Citation Numbers: 486 S.W.2d 782, 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2617
Judges: Roberts
Filed Date: 10/25/1972
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Walter L. Knapp, Amarillo, for appellant.
Tom Curtis, Dist. Atty., John J. Wheir, Asst. Dist. Atty., Amarillo, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
ROBERTS, Judge.
The offense is robbery by assault. Appellant pled guilty, and punishment was enhanced, resulting in a sentence of life imprisonment.
The appellant was apprised of the range of punishment, but nowhere does *783 there appear an inquiry as to whether or not appellant was influenced by any consideration of fear, or by any persuasion, or delusive hope of pardon, which might have prompted him to confess his guilt. Art. 26.13, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.
This Court has held this defect to be reversible error on many occasions. Once again, we are forced to recite that this provision of Art. 26.13 is mandatory. Crocker v. State, 485 S.W.2d 566 (Tex.Cr. App. October 11, 1972); Ex parte Battenfield, 466 S.W.2d 569 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Ex parte Chavez, 482 S.W.2d 175 (Tex.Cr. App.1972); Ex parte Marshall, 479 S.W.2d 921 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Ex parte Humphrey, 456 S.W.2d 118 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Miller v. State, 424 S.W.2d 430 (Tex.Cr. App.1968); Rogers v. State, 479 S.W.2d 42 (Tex.Cr.App.1972).
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Williams v. State , 1975 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 937 ( 1975 )
Clayton v. State , 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2402 ( 1973 )
Bosworth v. State , 1974 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1554 ( 1974 )
Heathcock v. State , 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1975 ( 1973 )
Griffin v. State , 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2260 ( 1973 )
Espinosa v. State , 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2415 ( 1973 )