Simmons v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-118V
Filed: October 21, 2015
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED
E.S., *
* Special Master Gowen
Petitioner, *
*
v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ronald C. Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.
Ann D. Martin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1
On February, 10, 2014, E.S. (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012). Petitioner alleged
that as a result of receiving human papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccinations on July 28, 2011, and
September 28, 2011, she developed chronic urticaria (“hives”). Petition at Intro. On May 11,
2015, the parties filed a stipulation in which they stated that a decision should be entered
awarding compensation to petitioner. See Stipulation, filed May 11, 2015 ¶ 7. A Decision
adopting the parties’ stipulation was issued May 12, 2015, and Judgment entered on May 19,
1
Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified
as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days
within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or
commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or
similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine
Rule 18(b).
2
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-
1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine
Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa.
1
2015.
Petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs on October 2, 2015. On October
19, 2015, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs, stating
that “while [she] disagrees with the analysis and findings in [McCulloch], respondent has
determined that her resources are not wisely used by continuing to litigate the issues addressed in
that decision.” Response to Motion at 1-2. Accordingly, respondent indicated that she “defers to
the special master’s statutory discretion in determining a reasonable fee award for this case.” Id.
at 2.
Petitioner here requests a total award of fees and costs in the amount of $15,567.49.
Motion for Attorney Fees & Costs at ¶ A. This amount includes attorneys’ fees in the amount of
$13,916.60, and attorneys’ costs in the amount of $1,650.89. Id. Additionally, in accordance
with General Order #9, petitioner represents that he incurred no reimbursable costs in pursuit of
this claim. Pet. and Counsel Statement at 1.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. §
300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, which is consistent with the
rates and reasoning established in McCulloch, the undersigned GRANTS the request for
approval and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs.
Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:
(1) in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorneys
at Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, in the amount of $15,567.49.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance herewith.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas L. Gowen
Thomas L. Gowen
Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2