Fishkis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-527V
Filed: November 24, 2015
************************* UNPUBLISHED
REBECCA FISHKIS, *
* Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman
Petitioner, *
v. * Petitioner’s Costs; Reasonable Amount
* Requested to which Respondent
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Does Not Object.
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*************************
Mark L. Krueger, Krueger & Hernandez, S.C., Baraboo, WI, for Petitioner.
Lara Englund and Lynn Ricciardella, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
Respondent.
DECISION 1
On June 20, 2014, Rebecca Fishkis (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under
the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq. (2006)
(“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that the administration of Human Papillomavirus (“HPV”)
vaccines on March 26, 2007, August 1, 2007, and June 16, 2008 caused her to suffer from
premature ovarian failure.
On November 24, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Fact Concerning Petitioner’s
Costs. Pursuant to their stipulation, the parties have agreed to an award of $2,049.05 for costs
incurred personally by Petitioner.
The undersigned finds that an award for costs is appropriate pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate.
Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the amount of $2,049.05, in the form of a
check made payable solely to Petitioner, Rebecca Fishkis.
1
The undersigned intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’
website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each
party has 14 days within which to file a motion for redaction “of any information furnished by that party
(1) that is trade secret or commercial or financial information and is privileged or confidential, or (2) that
are medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion
of privacy.” In the absence of such motion, the entire decision will be available to the public. Id.1
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation. 2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman
Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman
Special Master
2
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2