DocketNumber: 16-1119
Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey
Filed Date: 4/26/2018
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1119V Filed: January 22, 2018 UNPUBLISHED VERA SPEARMAN, Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint v. Stipulation on Damages; Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Encephalitis HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Howard Dale Mishkind, Mishkind Law Firm Co. L.P.A., Beachwood, OH, for petitioner. Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On September 9, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered encephalitis “[a]s a direct and proximate result of the receipt of” the measles, mumps, and rubella (“MMR”) vaccine on May 16, 2014. Petition at ¶¶ 2-3; Stipulation, filed Jan. 22, 2018, at ¶¶ 1-2, 4. “Respondent denies that the MMR vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from encephalitis or any other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, on January 22, 2018, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002.44 U.S.C. § 3501
note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660,100 Stat. 3755
. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned awards the following compensation: A lump sum of $200,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id. The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2