DocketNumber: 1:09-vv-00518
Judges: Brian H. Corcoran
Filed Date: 7/22/2014
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 9-518V (Not to be published) ********************************* JOSEPH DAGENHART and CYNTHIA DAGENHART, * as Parents and Legal Representatives of their minor * Filed: July 1, 2014 daughter N.D., * * Decision by Stipulation; Petitioners, * Damages; Varicella Vaccine; * Encephalitis; Intractable v. * Seizure Disorder; Personality * and Behavior Changes * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ********************************* Ramon Rodriguez, III, Rawl, McNelis and Mitchell, P.C., Richmond, VA, for Petitioners. Lynn Ricciardella, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 On August 7, 2009, Petitioners Joseph and Cynthia Dagenhart filed a petition on behalf of their minor daughter N.D., seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Vaccine Program”). 2 Petitioners allege that N.D. suffered 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, I will post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the published decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole decision will be available to the public. (Id.) 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, encephalitis, an intractable seizure disorder, and personality and behavior changes as a result of receiving the varicella vaccine. Respondent denies that N.D.’s encephalitis, intractable seizure disorder, personality and behavior changes or any related medical problems were caused by the receipt of the varicella vaccine. Nonetheless both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a stipulation filed July 1, 2014 that the issues before them can be settled, and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation. I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein. The stipulation awards: a) A lump sum of $5,547.32, which amount represents reimbursement of the Commonwealth of Virginia Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners and Department of Medical Assistance Services Accounts Receivable Unit, TPLC, 5th Floor 600 E. Broad Street Richmond, VA 23219 Petitioners agree to endorse this check to the Department of Medical Assistance Services; and b) A lump sum of $500,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioners. This amount represents compensation for all remaining damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stipulation ¶ 8. I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioners. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 3 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa-10-' 300aa-34 (West 1991 & Supp. 2002). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa. 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by jointly (or separately) filing notice(s) renouncing their right to seek review. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Special Master