Stavretis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16-0579V
Filed: November 30, 2016
Unpublished
****************************
EVANGELINE STAVRETIS, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
v. * Influenza (“flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
* Related to Vaccine Administration
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)
*
Respondent. *
*
****************************
Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Douglas Ross, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On May 16, 2016, Evangeline Stavretis (“petitioner”), filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving
the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 10, 2014, she suffered a shoulder injury that
was caused-in-fact by her vaccination. The case was assigned to the Special
Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.
On August 31, 2016, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement, finding
petitioner entitled to compensation for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
(“SIRVA”). On November 28, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of
compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $85,000.00. Proffer at
1-2. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled
to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
petitioner a lump sum payment of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
petitioner, Evangeline Stavretis. This amount represents compensation for all
damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
************************** * *
*
EVANGELINE STAVRETIS, *
*
Petitioner, *
*
v. * No. 16-579V (ECF)
* CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER
* NORA BETH DORSEY
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*****************************
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
In her November 2, 2016 decision, the Chief Special Master found that a preponderance
of the medical evidence indicates that petitioner suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”), which was causally related to the flu vaccination she received on
November 10, 2014. The parties have now addressed the amount of compensation to be awarded
in this case.
I. Item of Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
a total lump sum of $85,000.00, which amount represents all elements of compensation to which
petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
1
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future
medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the
right to move the Court for appropriate relief.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN C. MIZER
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Acting Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
VORIS E. JOHNSON, JR.
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/ DOUGLAS ROSS
DOUGLAS ROSS
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel.: (202) 616-3667
DATE: November 28, 2016
2