DocketNumber: No. 981509
Citation Numbers: 98 P.3d 1, 2004 UT 67, 506 Utah Adv. Rep. 17, 2004 Utah LEXIS 157
Judges: Allphin, Durham, Durrant, Greenwood, Having, Herein, Nehring, Orme, Parrish, Themselves, Wilkins
Filed Date: 8/17/2004
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
concurring:
T 61 I concur in the court's opinion. My limited purpose in writing separately is to
1 62 While at first blush it may seem otherwise, irrigating "natural" vegetation at water levels beyond what nature would itself provide is not a contradiction in terms. In our arid climate, especially during periods of drought, leaving natural vegetation alone-letting nature run its course-may well leave vegetation that is stunted and dry, resulting in a veritable tinderbox that is far from desirable in areas of human habitation. In contrast, watering such vegetation may permit it to grow and thrive, which may thus be beneficial in a utilitarian as well as a purely aesthetic sense. I gather that a more natural approach to landscaping, if done correctly, also results in reduced water consumption compared to the water required to sustain more traditional residential landscaping, thus paying broader societal dividends of conservation. -It is not really much of a stretch at all to view such a use of water as constituting a valid beneficial use.