DocketNumber: 2037983
Filed Date: 2/2/1999
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Elder, Bumgardner and Lemons ROBERT H. WOOD MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2037-98-3 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 2, 1999 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND ELECTRIC MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Robert H. Wood, pro se). No brief for appellees. Robert H. Wood ("claimant") contends that the Workers' Compensation Commission ("commission") erred in finding that Dr. Charles Ashworth was not his authorized treating physician, and, therefore, employer was not responsible for the cost of medical treatment rendered by Dr. Ashworth and by Dr. William E. Frank, upon referral from Dr. Ashworth. Upon reviewing the record and appellant's opening brief, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. See Rule 5A:27. In denying claimant's request that employer be held responsible for the cost of medical treatment rendered to claimant by Drs. Ashworth and Frank, the commission found as follows: Although he was treated several times by the employer's plant physician, Dr. Robert J. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication. Glenn, Mr. Wood notes that his employer did not give him a panel from which to choose an authorized physician. He reasons that because he was not given a panel he could choose Dr. Ahsworth [sic] to be his authorized physician. The fact that Mr. Wood was not given a panel did not give him the right to choose Dr. Ashworth as his treating physician. In 1987, the Commission held that Dr. Glenn became Mr. Wood's treating physician. Because of that opinion, Mr. Wood's treating physician was Dr. Glenn. Therefore, Dr. Ashworth's treatment and the referrals by him are not the employer's responsibility. The commission's 1987 opinion held that Dr. Glenn was claimant's treating physician. That opinion was not appealed, and, therefore, became final. In general, absent a referral from Dr. Glenn, the authorized treating physician, claimant was not entitled to change treating physicians except by permission from the commission or the employer. See Shenandoah Prods., Inc. v. Whitlock,15 Va. App. 207
, 210,421 S.E.2d 483
, 485 (1992). No evidence showed that claimant sought permission from the commission or employer to seek medical treatment from Drs. Ashworth or Frank. Accordingly, because Dr. Ashworth was not an authorized treating physician, any referral of claimant by Dr. Ashworth to Dr. Frank would also have been unauthorized. Based upon this record, the commission did not err in refusing to hold employer responsible for the cost of medical treatment rendered 1 to claimant by either Dr. Ashworth or Dr. Frank. 1 We note, as did the commission, that the documents submitted by claimant after the commission's decision did not qualify as after-discovered evidence, and, therefore, we did not consider them on appeal. - 2 - For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. Affirmed. - 3 -