Wrangler, Inc. v. Mary v. Coxson

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Benton, Annunziata and Humphreys
Argued at Richmond, Virginia
WRANGLER, INC.
MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY
v. Record No. 2460-01-2 JUDGE ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA
APRIL 30, 2002
MARY V. COXSON
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
J. David Griffin (Beth M. Coyne; Fowler,
Griffin, Coyne, Coyne & Patton, P.C., on
briefs), for appellant.
Wesley G. Marshall for appellee.
Wrangler, Inc. (employer) appeals the decision of the
Workers' Compensation Commission to compensate Mary V. Coxson
(claimant) for medical expenses incurred as a result of a
work-related accident. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Background
Mary V. Coxson was employed with Wrangler, Inc. for
approximately 29 years as a seamstress and production worker.
On January 17, 1995, while performing her duties, she fell on a
slippery floor. She landed on her buttocks, back, and left arm.
On April 16, 1996, based on the parties' stipulations, a deputy
commissioner entered a "medical only" award for her injuries to
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not
designated for publication.
her back, leg, hip, arm, and neck arising out of and in the
course of her employment.
Prior to the accident, Coxson had no back pain and had
never been treated by a health care provider for problems
related to her back. Following the incident, she did not have
any other accidents that injured her back.
Dr. Christopher Zielinski, an orthopedist, began treating
Coxson on February 13, 1995. Dr. Zielinski reported that Coxson
suffered low back pain and lumbar strain caused by a fall at
work on January 17, 1995. He prescribed physical therapy. The
physical therapist's note reports Coxson's slip and fall as the
cause of claimant's back strain. On June 14, 1995,
Dr. Zielinski noted that Coxson's physical therapist had
determined that continued treatment would not assist Coxson, and
treatment was discontinued.
Coxson did not seek treatment again until May 15, 1996,
when she returned to Dr. Zielinski complaining of right-sided
lumbar pain that had not changed since she had last seen him.
He diagnosed chronic, nagging back pain, and referred her for
blood work and a bone scan.
Coxson again returned to Dr. Zielinski on January 17, 1998.
He ordered an MRI, which showed degenerative disc disease with
spinal stenosis at the L4 transitional level, but no focal disc
herniation and no lateralization to the right. He opined that
- 2 -
Coxson's fall in January 1995 "at the very best . . .
exacerbated a pre-existing condition."
On August 12, 1998, Dr. John Jane evaluated Coxson in the
neurosurgery department of the University of Virginia. In
describing her medical history in his report, he noted that
Coxson suffered a worker's compensation injury in January 1995
and suffered low back pain and bilateral leg pain, right more
than left. He ordered an MRI, which showed a large disc
fragment stretching from L3 to L4 to L5. Dr. Jane noted that
her prior MRI did not show a lesion of this size. On November
16, 1998, Dr. Jane performed a partial hemilaminectomy and
discectomy and referred her to Dr. Robert Wilder, a physical
medicine specialist.
Dr. Wilder examined Coxson on March 31, 1999. In his
report, Dr. Wilder notes that Coxson reported an onset of
symptoms related to her 1995 fall. He diagnosed her with
status-post-lumbar discectomy, lumbar and thoracic pain
syndrome, possible right radicular symptoms and possible
pesanswerine tendonitis. He also noted that she had undergone
extensive treatment including surgery, physical therapy, steroid
injections, and medication. On December 11, 2000, Dr. Wilder
issued an Attending Physician's Report indicating that Coxson's
current back injury related back to her 1995 fall.
Coxson requested and received coverage from her health
insurance company for her medical care, including the claims at
- 3 -
issue in this case. She requested workers' compensation
coverage for miles driven for medical care, and her
out-of-pocket expenses for medical services related to her back
injury, including surgery. On each of her claim forms, her
physicians certified that her condition was not related to her
employment.
The deputy commissioner held that the employer was
responsible for payment of medical expenses related to Coxson's
back and knee. The employer appealed, and the commission
affirmed the award relating to Coxson's back injury, but
reversed the award for expenses relating to her knee injury.
Analysis
The employer contends on appeal that the commission erred
in finding the evidence sufficient to prove that Coxson's
medical expenses for her back injury were caused by the January
17, 1995 accident. See Code § 65.2-101; Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Co. v. Harris, 35 Va. App. 162, 167, 543 S.E.2d 619, 621 (2001).
Because "[t]he actual determination of causation is a factual
finding[, it] will not be disturbed on appeal if supported by
credible evidence." Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Musick, 7 Va. App.
684, 688, 376 S.E.2d 814, 817 (1989); see Watkins v. Halco
Engineering, 225 Va. 97, 101, 300 S.E.2d 761, 763 (1983).
Evidence to the contrary in the record is of no consequence if
there is credible evidence to support the commission's finding.
Wagner Enterprises v. Brooks, 12 Va. App. 890, 804, 407 S.E.2d
- 4 -
32, 35 (1991). Furthermore, on appeal "we view the evidence in
the light most favorable to [Coxson], the party prevailing
before the commission." Great Eastern Resort Corp. v. Gordon,
31 Va. App. 608, 610, 525 S.E.2d 55, 56 (2000).
In reaching its decision, the commission noted that
Drs. Jane and Wilder related Coxson's back injury to her January
1995 fall, that Coxson consistently complained of and sought
treatment for her back problems from the time of her accident
forward but not before, and that there was no evidence of
intervening accidents or injuries to her back. We find that
this evidence is credible and adequately supports the
commission's factual finding.
The employer argues, however, that the commission erred in
disregarding the gaps of time during which Coxson did not seek
medical treatment for her back, Coxson's health insurance
claims, which stated that her medical expenses were not caused
by a work-related injury and the opinion of Dr. Zielinski, which
indicated that Coxson's injuries did not relate back to her
industrial accident. We find no merit in these contentions.
It is well settled that the consideration and weight to be
given to the evidence, including medical evidence, is within the
sound discretion of the commission. See Waynesboro Police v.
Coffey, 35 Va. App. 264, 268, 544 S.E.2d 860, 861 (2001);
Hungerford Mechanical Corp. v. Hobson, 11 Va. App. 675, 677, 401
S.E.2d 213, 215 (1991). Therefore, assuming without deciding
- 5 -
that Dr. Zielinski's medical opinion and the statements made on
Coxson's health insurance claim forms support the employer's
position, the commission was not bound to accept them. See
McLane v. Commonwealth, 202 Va. 197, 206, 116 S.E.2d 274, 281
(1960); Piatt v. Piatt, 27 Va. App. 426, 434, 499 S.E.2d 567,
571 (1998). Rather, the commission, in its discretion, was
entitled to accept Dr. Wilder's opinion and consider the other
evidence tending to show that Coxson's surgery and other medical
services were caused by her fall on January 17, 1995. See
Chandler v. Schmidt Baking Co., 228 Va. 265, 268, 321 S.E.2d
296, 297 (1984) (noting that where expert testimony conflicts,
"the Commission may consider other evidence in determining
whether a claimant has met [her] burden of proof"). 1
Furthermore, to the extent that any evidence conflicts with the
commission's factual finding, we must discard it. Watkins v.
Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 335, 349, 494 S.E.2d 859, 866 (1998).
Because credible evidence supports the commission's
conclusion that Coxson's medical expenses were caused by her
1
The employer contends that the commission erred in relying
on Dr. Wilder's opinion that Coxson's back injuries related back
to her fall while rejecting his testimony regarding the causal
connection between her knee pain and the accident. In weighing
the evidence, however, the fact finder is entitled to "discard
or accept the testimony or any part thereof of any witness
. . . ." Diggs v. Lail, 201 Va. 871, 877, 114 S.E.2d 743, 748
(1960) (emphasis added); accord Rickman v. Commonwealth, 33 Va.
App. 550, 554, 535 S.E.2d 187, 190 (2000).
- 6 -
January 17, 1995 accident, which the parties have stipulated is
compensable, we affirm the award of medical benefits.
Affirmed.
- 7 -