DocketNumber: No. 26175. En Banc.
Citation Numbers: 59 P.2d 1101, 187 Wash. 75
Judges: STEINERT, J.
Filed Date: 8/4/1936
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
Although I feel that some of the analogies and hypotheses in the prevailing opinion are unnecessary and not germane, I am most heartily in accord with the result: that the portion of § 4 condemned, undoubtedly contravenes Art. I, § 12, of the state constitution, which is the only question with which we should concern ourselves. I doubt whether relator is in any way denied any rights under the 14th amendment to the Federal constitution.
Isakson v. Rickey , 550 P.2d 359 ( 1976 )
Remington Arms Co. v. Skaggs , 55 Wash. 2d 1 ( 1959 )
Belancsik v. Overlake Memorial Hospital , 80 Wash. 2d 111 ( 1971 )
Alton v. PHILLIPS CO. v. STATE , 65 Wash. 2d 199 ( 1964 )
Fell v. Spokane Transit Authority , 911 P.2d 1319 ( 1996 )
Foley v. Department of Fisheries , 119 Wash. 2d 783 ( 1992 )
Orchard Grove Water Ass'n v. King County Boundary Review ... , 24 Wash. App. 116 ( 1979 )
State v. Nixon , 10 Wash. App. 355 ( 1973 )
Childers v. Childers , 15 Wash. App. 792 ( 1976 )
Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners for Yakima ... , 92 Wash. 2d 831 ( 1979 )