DocketNumber: No. 25410. En Banc.
Citation Numbers: 40 P.2d 149, 180 Wash. 288
Judges: MITCHELL, J.
Filed Date: 1/4/1935
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
While I concur in the result reached in the majority opinion, I do not find myself in agreement with those portions of the opinion which imply that the ordinance under attack finds support in the existence of an emergency, or in the fact that the services for the payment of which the bonds are to be sold, were rendered by police and firemen. The latter part of the opinion, upholding the power of the city council to pass the ordinance as a proper exercise of its discretion in the management of the city's finances, is entirely right, and in my opinion, is all that the court was called upon to say.
The problem confronting the city of Seattle by reason of the court's decision in the case of State ex rel. Knez v. Seattle,
STEINERT, J., concurs with GERAGHTY, J.