DocketNumber: No. 6708
Citation Numbers: 47 Wash. 8
Filed Date: 8/5/1907
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 8/12/2021
This is an action upon a bank draft. The draft in question was taken by the appellants in part payment of the purchase price of certain real property owned by the respondent and which the appellants, who are real estate agents, held for sale. It appears from the record that in 1904 the property was owned by one Cummings. Cummings at that time was in need of money, and the respondent purchased the property of him at an agreed price for his accommodation, and at the same time gave Cumimings the privilege of reselling it at a net price to the respondent of a fixed sum, agreeing to give him all that he could obtain for the property over and above the sum so fixed. Cummings listed the property with the appellants. In October, 1905, the appellants found
“Seattle, Wash., Oct. 3rd, ’05.
“Received from Chas. E. Marvin & Sons Co., for account of a client Four Hundred Dollars, as surety deposit payment made by them on the purchase made by their client of seventeen (17) acres of land near the mouth of the Duwamish River and known as the E. M. Tatterson tract and particularly described as follows:
“Beginning at a point on the west line thereof, distant 21.38 rods south of the north line thereof; thence east 125.46*10 rods more or less to a point distant 24.54 rods from the east line of said southwest quarter; thence south 14 deg. 22' east 17.60 rods; thence south 39 deg. east 5.39 rods to a point distant 16.75 rods west from the east line of said southwest quarter; thence west 133.25 rods more or less to the west line of said southwest quarter; thence north along said west line 21.37 rods to the place of beginning.
. “The purchase price of this property is thirty-seven hundred ($3700) dollars to me with a condition that any margin which you secure in selling this property above thirty-seven hundred dollars shall be the total brokerage allowed you for selling the property.
“Payments: Four Hundred ($400) Dft. the receipt of which is hereinabove acknowledged and thirty-three hundred dollars ($3300) payable on or before November 1st, 1905. The object, of the extension being to enable you to have the time till November 1st, 1905, to fully close up the deal if necessary. If not closed by this time the Four Hundred ($400) shall be forfeited, with the condition if the title is not satisfactory and complete to your attorney I will' return the Four Hundred Dollars ($400) received this day. Deed to be made as ordered. W. L. O’Connell.
“Witness: M. J. Cummings.”
The appellants contend that they are not hable on their indorsement for the reason that they were the respondent’s agents, authorized by him to sell the property, and that when they did sell it and took the draft from the purchaser they took it as the respondent’s property, and their indorsement was nothing more than a means of transferring the legal title to the respondent, being necessary because the draft was payable to them; and they cite cases maintaining the rule that an-agent who takes negotiable paper in his own name and indorses the same to his principal is. not liable thereon, unless it is expressly agreed or intended that he shall assume a personal liability.
But we think this rule has no application here. The appellants were in no sense the agents of the respondent. They were not empowered to make contracts for him or in his name, nor did they bear to him any fiduciary relation whatever. On
The judgment is affirmed.