DocketNumber: No. 540
Citation Numbers: 6 Wash. 603, 34 P. 143, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 345
Judges: Hoyt
Filed Date: 7/6/1893
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The application for a writ of mandamus must be denied. The judgment which relator seeks to compel the lower court to enter is not authorized by the decision of this court. The opinion heretofore rendered (5 Wash. 665, 32 Pac. Bep. 789) clearly shows that this court recog
It will thus be seen that the judgment which the petition and answer show that the court below was willing to enter was substantially the one directed by this court, with the exception that it does not appear that it proposed to enter a judgment in favor of the assignee as against the other parties to the action for costs. But from what was said upon the argument we are satisfied that a bare suggestion will induce the court below to so modify its judgment entry as to cover the question of costs. It is clear that since, if the goods had not been converted into money, the assignee would have been adjudged to be entitled to the possession thereof, and as an incident to such judgment would have recovered his costs against the adverse parties, he is entitled, in addition to having the proceeds of such goods turned over to him, to have judgment for his costs.
Dunbar, O. J., and Scott and Anders, JJ., concur.
Stiles, J., not sitting.