State of Washington v. Lance Theopolis Smith

FILED
AUGUST 3, 2017
In the Office of the Clerk of Court
WA State Court of Appeals, Division III
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION THREE
STATE OF WASHINGTON, )
) No. 34153-4-111
Respondent, )
)
V. )
)
LANCE THEOPOLIS SMITH, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION
)
Appellant. )
FEARING, C.J. -As Richland Police Officer Drew Florence assisted in restraining
Lance Smith, Smith reared his head and struck Florence, under Florence's eye, with his
head. From a conviction for third degree assault, Smith appeals and contends the State
lacked sufficient evidence to convict him because the evidence did not prove he intended
to assault the officer. We disagree and affirm Smith's conviction.
FACTS
The prosecution of Lance Smith arises from his reaction to arrest on July 16, 2014.
On the morning of July 16, Darryl Smith, Lance Smith's father, noticed his vehicle
missing and phoned the Richland Police Department to report the car stolen. Darryl
No. 34153-4-III
State v. Smith
Smith suspected one of his children appropriated the vehicle. In the early afternoon of
the same day, Lance Smith returned his father's vehicle to the father's apartment and
immediately departed the residence on foot. Darryl Smith notified the police department
that his son returned the vehicle. In addition, he informed the police that his son acted
aggressively and Darryl's mother, Lance Smith's grandmother, left the apartment because
of concern for her safety.
Richland Police Officer Joe Brazeau responded to Darryl Smith's second call.
Dispatch informed Officer Brazeau that Lance Smith returned a stolen vehicle to his
father's house and was causing a disturbance at the home. Dispatch also relayed that
Smith recently left his father's home and walked westbound on Columbia Park Trail.
Officer Joe Brazeau located Smith in the parking lot of Kimo's Restaurant. He
asked Smith questions about his father's vehicle and the disturbance at the house. Smith
grew agitated. Smith stared at Brazeau, leaned toward Brazeau, flexed his muscles, and
answered questions in a loud voice. Brazeau announced to Smith that he was being
detained. Smith yelled that he (Smith) was detained. Smith repeatedly talked
nonsensically. He asked Brazeau ifhe was a king or had a vagina.
Kennewick Police Officers Rebecca Jones and Josh Sullivan arrived shortly to
assist Officer Joe Brazeau. On the arrival of police assistance, Lance Smith's aggressive
behavior progressively worsened. Smith lost self-control. Dispatch informed Officer
Brazeau that probable cause supported an arrest of Smith for taking his father's vehicle.
2
No. 34153-4-111
State v. Smith
Brazeau recognized the futility of further dialogue with Smith. Accordingly, Brazeau
arrested Smith for stealing his father's vehicle. Brazeau grabbed Smith's wrist to
handcuff him, but Smith spun in an attempt to break contact. Smith disobeyed all of
Brazeau's verbal commands. Officers Jones and Sullivan assisted Brazeau in taking
Smith to the ground. Smith resisted by fighting and swinging to escape from Brazeau' s
grip. Brazeau performed several knee strikes to Smith's lower back and buttocks to gain
control. Eventually, the officers handcuffed Smith.
Meanwhile, Richland Police Officers Jason Crouch and Drew Florence reported to
the scene. The group of officers lifted Smith from the ground. Officer Crouch frisked
Lance Smith for weapons and contraband. Crouch held Smith's right arm while
searching the right side of his body. Officer Florence approached Smith from an angle to
assist Crouch. As Florence stepped toward Smith, Smith reared and swung his head and
hit Florence underneath the eye with his forehead. Smith inflicted no permanent damage,
but Florence's face swelled and temporarily turned red.
After seeing Lance Smith head butt Officer Drew Florence, Officer Jason Crouch
grabbed Smith by the hair and pushed him onto the patrol car. The officers soon
recognized the high heat in the patrol car, so they relocated Smith to the pavement after
I placing a sweatshirt underneath him. Crouch then placed a pair of hobble restraints on
I Smith, which restricted the movement of his feet. The officers lifted Smith off the
1
l
3
No. 34153-4-III
State v. Smith
ground and transferred him to the inside of the now cooler patrol car. Officer Joe
Brazeau transported Smith to Kadlec Regional Medical Center for medical evaluation.
Richland Officer Jason Crouch later spoke with Darryl Smith, Lance Smith's
father, about the stolen vehicle. Darryl Smith indicated that he did not wish his son
prosecuted for taking the vehicle.
PROCEDURE
The State of Washington charged Lance Smith with assault in the third degree.
The trial court repeatedly continued trial dates due to concerns about Smith's competency
to stand trial. The State requested, and the trial court granted, requests for competency
examinations at Eastern State Hospital. Dr. Nathan Henry, a licensed psychologist,
"
initially evaluated Smith and diagnosed him with bipolar disorder, manic and psychotic
features. Dr. Henry informed the court that Smith lacked the capacity to understand the
legal proceedings against him or participate in his own defense. Smith's last evaluation,
by licensed psychologist Dr. C. O'Donnell on December 21, 2015, showed no presence
of mental health symptoms and concluded that Smith possessed sufficient ability to
consult with his lawyer in the criminal proceedings. The trial court found Smith
competent to stand trial.
Lance Smith's jury trial commenced on February 1, 2016. At the proceeding,
Lance Smith wore makeup on his face resembling the Joker, the fictional supervillain
character featured 'in Batman comic books. The State called six witnesses: Darryl Smith
4
No. 34153-4-III
State v. Smith
and police officers Joe Brazeau, Rebecca Jones, Josh Sullivan, Jason Crouch, and Drew
Florence.
This appeal requires a review of each police officer's testimony regarding the
physical contact between Officer Drew Florence and appellant Lance Smith. Richland
Police Officer Joe Brazeau described that, during Officer Jason Crouch's frisk of Smith,
"at some point Mr. Smith basically leapt up, swung his head, and struck Officer Florence
in the face." Report of Proceedings (RP) at 64. Kennewick Police Officer Rebecca Jones
testified that she observed Smith "abruptly [thrust] his upper body into the air and in kind
of like a backwards motion (indicating)." RP at 84. Kennewick Police Officer Josh
Sullivan averred that, as he checked Smith's handcuffs, he saw Smith tense and jump.
Sullivan characterized the jump as "a mule kick, what we would have done in gym as
kids." RP at 99. Officer Sullivan did not see Smith's head strike Florence because
Sullivan focused his sight on Smith's legs.
Richland Police Officer Jason Crouch testified to witnessing Lance Smith strike
Richland Police Officer Drew Florence with his head. Crouch acknowledged that Smith
squirmed during the search incident to arrest. Crouch declared that "Officer Florence
came in to assist, and as Officer Florence leaned in to help Mr. Smith head butted Officer
Florence on the face." RP at 110. He added that he "actually saw [Smith] lunge forward
and strike Officer Florence in the head with his forehead." RP at 118.
The alleged victim, Richland Police Officer Drew Florence, testified:
5
No. 34153-4-111
State v. Smith
Q. Okay. So, as you got out of your car where did you go?
A. I walked over to where the other officers were, and there
were several of 'em standing around near another patrol vehicle.
Q. Did you say anything to anyone or did you just start helpin'
out?
A. No. I was just kind of, you know, tryin' to figure out
something that needed to be done. I saw that Officer Crouch was tryin'
to search a male subject, the one who was handcuffed, and he was tryin'
to kind of hold on to his right arm at the [same] time as trying to search
him. So, I went to go and kind of take control of the male's arm so I
could focus on searching him for weapons and things of that nature.
Q. What happened when you reached out to grab his arm?
A. So, I was about three feet away, and as I went to step towards
him he kind of reared up and with his head using a swinging motion
struck me underneath my eye (indicating) with his forehead (indicating).
Q. You were approaching from the front?
A. Yeah. Kind of-yes, the front, but also off to the side. Kind
of at an angle.
Q. When you say he swung, what do you mean?
A. Well, he just kind of used his head and neck in a swinging
motion (indicating) and kind of threw his body weight forward is I
guess how I would describe it. Kind of lurched forward.
RP at 129-30.
In further testimony, Officer Drew Florence recalled events transpiring quickly,
but remembered Smith moving toward him. Florence said "I saw him coming at me, but
when he hit me-it doesn't happen every day. So, it just took me a second to kind of
figure out what happened." RP at 13 7. Officer Florence also recounted a conversation
he overheard at Kadlec Regional Medical Center between Smith and one of Smith's
treating physicians. In response to a question from the physician regarding what
occurred, Florence heard Smith reply: "he had 'head butted a police officer' and that he
6
No. 34153-4-111
State v. Smith
probably shouldn't have done that." RP at 132.
Lance Smith testified in his defense. Smith asserted that he did not intentionally
strike Officer Drew Florence. He said that he "got spooked and it just like bumped him
right under the eye." RP at 152. Smith explained that "[o]ne of the cops goes, 'Did he
just head butt you?' and I look at him like, 'No, guys.' He goes, 'Yeah, I think he head
butted me,' and they go, 'Oh, you're goin' down,' and they said something like that." RP
at 153. He claimed that he did not hear Officer Florence approaching him. "I just looked
over and his face was right there (indicating)-and I just went like that (indicating)-and
literally his face was right here (indicating)." RP at 156. Smith clarified Florence's
account of the conversation that transpired with him and his doctor at Kadlec Regional
Medical Center. Smith remembered telling the doctor that "[ s]ome cop told me I head
butted [one of the police officers]. I didn't, and they just beat the crap out of me." RP at
158.
The trial court instructed the jury that, in order to convict Lance Smith, it must
find beyond a reasonable doubt that (1) on or about July 16, 2014, Smith assaulted Drew
Florence, (2) at the time of the assault, Officer Florence was a law enforcement officer or
other employee of a law enforcement agency who was performing his official duties, and
(3) that any of these acts occurred in the State of Washington. A jury instruction defined
"assault" as:
7
No. 34153-4-III
State v. Smith
An assault is an intentional touching or striking of another
person, with unlawful force, that is harmful or offensive regardless of
whether any injury is done to the person. A touching or striking is
offensive if the touching or striking would offend an ordinary person
who is not unduly sensitive.
Clerk's Papers (CP) at 181. Another instruction declared: "[a] person acts with intent or
intentionally when acting with the objective or purpose to accomplish a result that
constitutes a crime." CP at 182.
The jury found Lance Smith guilty of assaulting Officer Drew Florence. The trial
court sentenced Smith to three months' confinement and up to twelve months of
community custody.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
The sole issue on appeal is whether the State presented sufficient evidence from
which the jury could infer that Lance Smith acted with intent when he assaulted Officer
Drew Florence. We conclude that the State presented sufficient evidence.
We review familiar principles of sufficiency of evidence. Evidence suffices to
convict, if, after viewing it in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact
could find each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Green, 94
Wash. 2d 216, 221-22, 616 P.2d 628 (1980). A defendant challenging sufficiency ofthe
evidence at trial admits the truth of the State's evidence and all reasonable inferences
therefrom. State v. Witherspoon, 180 Wash. 2d 875, 883, 329 P.3d 888 (2014). This court
defers to the fact finder's credibility determinations and determinations of the
8
No. 34153-4-111
State v. Smith
persuasiveness of the evidence. State v. Thomas, 150 Wash. 2d 821, 874, 83 P.3d 970
(2004).
RCW 9A.36.031 creates the crime of third degree assault. The statute reads:
( 1) A person is guilty of assault in the third degree if he or she,
under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first or second
degree: ... (g) Assaults a law enforcement officer or other employee of
a law enforcement agency who was performing his or her official duties
at the time of the assault.
Lance Smith did not contest he made physical contact with a law enforcement officer.
Therefore, in order to convict Lance Smith of assault in the third degree, the jury needed
to find that the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Smith intended to assault
Officer Drew Florence. State v. Brown, 140 Wash. 2d 456, 467-68, 998 P.2d 321 (2000).
A person acts with intent when he or she acts with the objective or purpose to
accomplish a result constituting a crime. RCW 9A.08.010(1)(a). The trial court properly .f
instructed the jury that "[a] person acts with intent or intentionally when acting with the
objective or purpose to accomplish a result that constitutes a crime." CP at 182. Intent
"can be inferred as a logical probability from all the facts and circumstances." State v.
Wilson, 125 Wn.2d 212,217,883 P.2d 320 (1994). Ajury may infer that a defendant
acted with intent even without direct evidence. State v. Bea, 162 Wash. App. 570, 579, 254
P.3d 948 (2011).
A jury may infer criminal intent from a defendant's conduct where it
is plainly indicated as a matter of logical probability. This includes
9
No. 34153-4-III
State v. Smith
inferring or permissibly presuming that a defendant intends the natural and
probable consequences of his or her acts.
State v. Bea, 162 Wash. App. at 579 (citations omitted).
Lance Smith argues that the State's evidence only shows he struck Officer Drew
Florence in the face and not that his conduct was intentional. He further argues that the
jury did not rely on facts or inferences from the facts, but rather speculated that he acted
intentionally. We disagree. While Smith testified that the contact was accidental and he
did not head butt Officer Florence intentionally, the jury held the prerogative to
determine the credibility of his testimony. The jury was entitled to discredit Smith's
account and credit the evidence in favor of the State. Despite the State's failure to
directly question its witnesses regarding intentionality, the evidence presented, viewed in
favor of the State, is sufficient to establish intent. Intent may be drawn from an actor's
conduct. State v. Bea, 162 Wash. App. at 579 (2011). The State likely could present no
direct evidence of intent, since a witness may not testify to another's state of mind. Perry
v. Brakefield, 534 So. 2d 602, 608 (Ala. 1998); Combs v. Fantastic Homes, Inc., 584
S.W.2d 340, 344 (Tex. Civ. App. 1979); Taylor v. Lewis, 553 S.W.2d 153, 161 (Tex. Civ.
App. 1977); Taylor v. Roach, 302 So. 2d 327,331 (La. Ct. App. 1974); Medina v.
Sherrod, 391 S.W.2d 66, 69 (Tex. Civ. App. 1965); De Santis v. Massachusetts Bonding
& Ins. Co., 289 Mass. 315,194 N.E. 136,139 (1935).
10
No. 34153-4-III
State v. Smith
Each of the five police officers on scene described Lance Smith's body
movements leading to Lance Smith's assault of Officer Drew Florence. Officer Rebecca
Jones observed Smith abruptly thrust his upper body into the air. As Officer Josh
Sullivan checked Smith's handcuffs, he saw Smith tense and jump, characterizing the
jump as a mule kick. Officer Joe Brazeau testified that Smith leapt up, swung his head,
and struck Officer Florence in the face. Officer Jason Crouch declared that Smith lunged
forward and struck Officer Florence in the head with his forehead. Florence, the victim,
told the jury that Smith reared and swung his head to strike Florence under the eye.
Florence also relayed a conversation between Smith and his physician, during which
Smith commented that he had head butted a police officer. From this evidence, a rational
trier of fact could infer intent.
The State also provided evidence of Lance Smith's demeanor and actions toward
the other police officers during the encounter that support a finding of intent. Officer Joe
Brazeau, the first officer on the scene, described Smith as agitated and as exhibiting
aggressive behavior on questioning. Smith's conduct progressively worsened. Brazeau
detailed Smith's resistance to arrest and the difficulty involved in handcuffing Smith
when he struggled to escape.
CONCLUSION
We affirm Lance Smith's conviction for third degree assault.
11
No. 34153-4-111
State v. Smith
A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW
2.06.040.
WE CONCUR:
j
12