State v. Donte Quintell McBride

2023 WI 68SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
CASE NO.: 2021AP311-CR
COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin,
Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner,
v.
Donte Quintell McBride,
Defendant-Appellant.
REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
Reported at 405 Wis. 2d 771,985 N.W.2d 452(2023 – unpublished)
OPINION FILED: October 10, 2023
SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS:
ORAL ARGUMENT: September 15, 2023
SOURCE OF APPEAL:
COURT: Circuit
COUNTY: Milwaukee
JUDGE: Jonathan D. Watts
JUSTICES:
Per Curiam.
NOT PARTICIPATING:
Janet C. Protasiewicz, J.
ATTORNEYS:
For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner, there were briefs
filed by Kieran M. O’Day, assistant attorney general, with whom
on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general. There was an
oral argument by Kieran M. O’Day, assistant attorney general.
For the defendant-appellant, there was a brief filed by
Jill M. Skwor, assistant state public defender. There was an
oral argument by Jill M. Skwor, assistant state public defender.
2023 WI 68NOTICE
This opinion is subject to further
editing and modification. The final
version will appear in the bound
volume of the official reports.
No. 2021AP311-CR
(L.C. No. 2018CF5172)
STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT
State of Wisconsin,
Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner,
FILED
v. OCT 10, 2023
Donte Quintell McBride, Samuel A. Christensen
Clerk of Supreme Court
Defendant-Appellant.
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.
¶1 PER CURIAM. The decision of the court of appeals is
affirmed by an equally divided court.
¶2 JANET C. PROTASIEWICZ, J., did not participate.
No. 2021AP311-CR
1