Citation Numbers: 76 Op. Att'y Gen. 268
Judges: DONALD J. HANAWAY, Attorney General
Filed Date: 10/22/1987
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/15/2017
TOM LOFTUS, Chairperson Assembly Organization Committee
Vocational, Technical and Adult Education districts are authorized by section
Any person aggrieved by the levy and collection of any unlawful tax assessed against him may file a claim therefor against the town, city or village which collected such tax in the manner prescribed by law for filing claims in other cases. If it appears that the tax for which such claim was filed or any part thereof is unlawful and that all conditions prescribed by law for the recovery of unlawful taxes have been complied with, the town board, village board or common council may allow and the town, city or village treasurer shall pay such person the amount of the claim found to be unlawful and excessive. If any town, city or village fails or refuses to allow the claim, the claimant may have and maintain an action against the same for the recovery of all money so unlawfully levied and collected, together with interest at the legal rate computed from the date of filing the claim. Every such claim shall be filed, and every action to recover any money so paid shall be brought, within one year after such payment.
With respect to excessive assessments, section
No claim may be filed and no action may be brought under this section which is based upon an allegedly excessive assessment *Page 269 except that in counties with a population of under 500,000 which have not adopted a county assessor system a claim may be filed and an action may be brought if the tax is paid on the contested assessment by January 10 of the year following the year of the assessment and a claim filed within 10 days thereafter and suit commenced within 30 days following the denial of the claim or within 90 days after the claim is filed if the municipalities fail to act on the claim.
The same statute also establishes a procedure under which a city, village or town can then in turn recover the proportionate share of illegally collected tax which it paid over to the Vocational, Technical and Adult Education district. Section
If any town, city or village has paid such claim or any judgment recovered thereon after having paid over to the county treasurer the state, county and metropolitan sewerage area debt retirement tax levied and collected as part of such unlawful tax, or has paid any necessary expenses in defense of such action, the town, city or village shall be credited by the county treasurer, on the settlement with the proper treasurer for the taxes of the ensuing year, the whole amount of such state, county and metropolitan sewerage area debt retirement tax so paid into the county treasury and the county's, state's and metropolitan sewerage area debt retirement tax proportionate share of the taxable costs, interest and expenses of suit, unless such claim or judgment is the result of an error or defect, other than an error or defect of law, caused by the town, city or village or official thereof. The county treasurer shall also be allowed by the state treasurer the amount of state tax so illegally collected and the state's proportionate share of such taxable costs, interest and expenses of suit and shall be paid in his settlement with the state treasurer next after the payment of such claim or the collection of such judgment. If any part of such unlawful tax was paid over to any school district or vocational, technical and adult education district before the payment of such claim or judgment, the town shall charge the same to such district with the proportionate share of the taxable costs, interest and expenses of suit, and the *Page 270 town clerk shall add the same to the taxes of such district in the next annual tax.1
You ask whether this add-on method of recovering a proportionate share of the refund applies to both section
Section
Section
If the add-on provision did not apply, a city would be left with no statutory authority to charge back the proportionate share of excessive assessments and city taxpayers would be forced to bear *Page 271
the entire cost of these refunds, even though the cost of refunds for unlawful taxes would be shared. I see no logical reason why this inconsistency would be appropriate. In any event, I conclude that the add-on provision of section
DJH:BLB