Citation Numbers: 80 Op. Att'y Gen. 223
Judges: JAMES E. DOYLE, Attorney General
Filed Date: 4/30/1992
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
CAL W. KORNSTEDT, Corporation Counsel Dane County
The Dane County Clerk of Courts has proposed that the county board adopt a non-refundable processing fee for persons desiring to make installment payments under certain court orders. Under this apparently judicially created system of installment payments, a defendant might be granted up to one year to pay a fine or forfeiture imposed by the court. Under the clerk's proposal, the processing fee of $10 would be retained by the county in its general fund. It is your understanding that other counties apparently are in the process of enacting a similar fee for either the same or somewhat similar payments.
With this background, you ask whether the county board has authority to adopt such a processing fee and, in the alternative, whether the clerk of court possesses direct authority to impose such a fee even if the county board does not act.
It is my opinion that both the county board and the clerk of courts lack the authority to impose such a non-refundable processing fee.
As a public officer, the clerk of courts has only those powers expressly conferred by statute or those additional implied powers that are necessary for the due and efficient exercise of the powers expressly granted or powers that may be fairly inferred from such express powers. Pacific Nat. Fire Ins. Co. v. Irmiger,
Section
It has been suggested by others that the clerk is authorized to impose this fee under section 59.395 (8) which requires the clerk to "perform such other duties as required by law." It specifically has been suggested in at least one county that (1) one of the duties required by law is the management of the office of clerk of court, and (2) if as part of the management function a service is provided which is not statutorily required, there is no statutory prohibition to charging a fee to offset the cost of that service. I reject this conclusion as contrary to the principle that the clerk has only those powers expressly conferred by statute or fairly inferred from such expressed powers. Moreover, the Legislature has set the fees the clerk is entitled to retain for services rendered. For example, see sections
Although each circuit court clerk is required to exercise some discretion in the performance of certain duties (e.g., accepting or refusing to accept a paper for filing or recording before a prescribed fee is paid under section
As for the county board, it also possesses only those powers expressly conferred upon it or necessarily implied from the nature of the grant of power. Town of Vernon v. Waukesha County,
Where the Legislature has intended to permit some discretion in the establishment or raising of a fee, it has done so in clear and unambiguous language. For example, see section
JED:DPJ *Page 226
Town of Vernon v. Waukesha County , 102 Wis. 2d 686 ( 1981 )
Pacific Nat. Fire Ins. Co. v. Irmiger , 254 Wis. 207 ( 1949 )
Opinion No. Oag 111-77, (1977) , 66 Op. Att'y Gen. 358 ( 1977 )
(1972) , 61 Op. Att'y Gen. 214 ( 1972 )
Opinion No. Oag 8-89, (1989) , 78 Op. Att'y Gen. 38 ( 1989 )