Citation Numbers: 79 Op. Att'y Gen. 164
Judges: DONALD J. HANAWAY, Attorney General
Filed Date: 11/5/1990
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016
FRANK R. VAZQUEZ, Corporation Counsel Clark County
You have asked for my opinion on two questions regarding the provision of a cement grave liner by a funeral home in a county burial pursuant to section 49.30, Stats. First, you ask whether cement grave liners are properly classified as funeral and burial expenses or as cemetery expenses. Second, you ask if "actual cemetery expenses" includes a manufacturer/supplier's or funeral director's markup or profit on the original invoice bill.
The answer to your first question is that the characterization of a good or service as a funeral and burial expense or as a cemetery expense will depend upon who is providing that good or service. Thus, as here, a cement grave liner provided by a funeral home will be classified as a funeral and burial expense, whereas a cement grave liner provided by a cemetery will be considered a cemetery expense. This answer is necessitated by the difficulty in defining funeral and burial expenses and cemetery expenses and also determining the exact boundary between them. Both categories defy precise definition because the statutory language is couched in broad terms. Section 49.30 does not define funeral, burial or cemetery expenses. A prior opinion addressed this definitional problem and discussed the question of whether an expenditure constituted a funeral expense: "The latter question has caused considerable difficulty for courts of law, since it is usually held that what may be classed as a funeral expense varies with the official and financial standing of the decedent, his religious beliefs and the usages prevailing in his community." 34 Op. Att'y Gen. 191, 193 (1945). Also, on the *Page 165
federal level, the rules of the Federal Trade Commission regulating funeral industry practices contain neither a precise definition nor a distinction between both funeral and burial expenses and cemetery expenses. See
In addition, these categories overlap to a certain extent, further complicating the attempt to define them. For example, in the Department of Health and Social Services' Economic Assistance Manual and Handbook, Volume 7, chapter 7 (Funeral and Cemetery Charges), a "burial plot," "perpetual care" and "a minimum grave marker" are all considered "cemetery charges." However, these goods and services have also been characterized as "funeral expenses." In chapter 157, relating to the disposition of human remains, a provision involving the improvement and care of cemeteries states:
The board or any organization having a cemetery under its control may fix and determine the sum reasonably necessary for perpetual care of the grave or lot in reasonable and uniform amounts, which amounts shall be subject to the approval of the court, and may collect the same as part of the funeral expenses.
Sec.
A prior opinion based on this statutory provision concluded that under section
Next, you ask if "actual cemetery expenses" includes markup or profit. Section 49.30 contains two limits on the expense categories. First, section 49.30 (1)(b), as amended by 1989 Wisconsin Act 239, limits the amount the county shall pay for funeral and burial expenses to the lesser of $650 (in state fiscal year 1989-90 and $1,000 thereafter) or those funeral and burial expenses not paid by the estate.
Second, section 49.30 (1)(a) limits the amount the county shall pay for cemetery expenses to "actual cemetery expenses." An "actual" cost or expense is normally the actual price paid for goods by a party including such items as freight and handling but excluding profit. See Cassel v. Newark Ins. Co.,
In conclusion, it is my opinion that a cement grave liner provided by a funeral home constitutes a funeral and burial expense and is therefore subject to the $650/$1,000 statutory limit.
DJH:SWK *Page 168