DocketNumber: 7848
Citation Numbers: 172 S.E. 611, 114 W. Va. 423, 1933 W. Va. LEXIS 94
Judges: Maxwell
Filed Date: 12/12/1933
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
The sheriff of Kanawha County seeks by mandamus to compel the county court to issue orders for the salaries of the sheriff and his deputies. No orders were issued for September, October or November, 1933.
The county court answers that there is no money in the general county fund with which to pay these salaries; that by reason of the decision of this Court in the cases ofBee v. City of Huntington and Eakle v. County Court of BraxtonCounty, decided together,
The relator takes the position that notwithstanding the situation disclosed by the respondents, orders for monthly installments of salaries of county officials should nevertheless be issued. He says that the issuance of orders, even though there are no funds to pay them, is contemplated by the provisions of Code 1931,
"If, when an order is presented to the sheriff, there are no funds to pay the same, the person entitled to receive the sum of money specified in such order may require the sheriff to indorse thereon, or write across the face thereof, the words 'presented for payment,' with the proper date, and sign the same; and the order, if it was due at the time of presentment, shall in such case be payable with legal interest from such date: * * *."
We do not interpret that provision as applicable to a situation such as is here presented. The purpose of that statute is to meet casual situations only, and is not meant to authorize the issuance of orders where there are no funds in existence regularly applicable to the discharge of such orders, and no funds for which provision has been made by authorized levies, and no funds otherwise available. The statute presupposes either existing funds in the county treasury out of which county orders can be paid, or an actual levy which will in the regular order of events produce such funds. This conclusion, that funds must be existing or potential before orders for money may be lawfully issued, is unavoidable in the light of another statute, very emphatic in its terms, which expressly forbids any local fiscal body from expending money or incurring obligations in excess of the funds available for current expenses. Acts Regular Session Legislature of West Virginia 1933, chapter 38, section 20.
This section is a successor of Code 1931,
In the light of the considerations thus presented, we are of opinion to refuse the writ.
Writ refused.
Memo. Sec. 17 of Act of Extraordinary Session of the Legislature (committee substitute for House Bill No. 63) passed December 9, 1933, in effect from passage, is the same as section 20, chapter 38, Acts Regular Session, 1933.