DocketNumber: 24 January Term 1970, Docket No. 52,508. No. 18 June Term 1971, Docket No. 52,508
Citation Numbers: 189 N.W.2d 224, 385 Mich. 618, 1971 Mich. LEXIS 213
Judges: Black, Kavanagh, Adams, Brennan, Swainson, Williams
Filed Date: 8/27/1971
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/10/2024
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*619 Foster, Lindemer, Swift & Collins (by James A. White and Lynwood E. Beekman), for plaintiff.
Zerafa & Zerafa (by Robert J. Kievit), for defendants.
Amici Curiae: American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan (by Erwin B. Ellmann).
American Civil Liberties Union (by Melvin L. Wulf, Legal Director).
ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
We granted rehearing in this case to reconsider the question which divided our Court[1] and to weigh the effect of Goldberg v. Kelly (1970), 397 U.S. 254 (90 S. Ct. 1011, 25 L. Ed. 287) decided subsequent to our prior decision herein on the question of due process.
We are satisfied that the Michigan statute[2] properly interpreted fully satisfies the constitutional requirements of due process.
For the reasons set forth in the minority opinion heretofore filed herein and reported at 383 Mich. 661, beginning at 688, which is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court, we hold that under the statute, unless a probationary teacher is notified in writing that his work is unsatisfactory, upon completion of his probationary period he is entitled to employment *620 with tenure status with all of its specified rights and privileges.
Let mandamus issue as prayed.
T.M. KAVANAGH, C.J., and ADAMS, T.E. BRENNAN, T.G. KAVANAGH, SWAINSON, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concurred.
BLACK, J. (dissenting).
I adhere to the majority opinion and decision (383 Mich. 661). Nothing set forth in Goldberg v. Kelly (1970), 397 U.S. 254 (90 S. Ct. 1011, 25 L. Ed. 2d 287), upon alleged strength of which the instant rehearing was ordered, is offended by our said decision. Indeed, Goldberg is not presently assigned as applicable to or for reversal of that decision.
My vote on rehearing is cast for affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals (17 Mich App (368).
[1] (1970), 383 Mich. 661.
[2] MCLA § 38.71 et seq. (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 15.1971 et seq.).
Goldberg v. Kelly , 90 S. Ct. 1011 ( 1970 )
United States v. Central Pacific Railroad , 25 L. Ed. 287 ( 1879 )
Boyce v. Royal Oak Board of Education , 407 Mich. 312 ( 1979 )
Amato v. Oxford Area Community School District No 7 , 402 Mich. 521 ( 1978 )
Commeret v. Board of Education , 75 Mich. App. 115 ( 1977 )
Anderson v. Westwood Community School District , 49 Mich. App. 406 ( 1973 )
Lipka v. Brown City Community Schools , 59 Mich. App. 175 ( 1975 )
Blurton v. Bloomfield Hills Board of Education , 60 Mich. App. 741 ( 1975 )
Ferndale Education Ass'n v. School District for City of ... , 67 Mich. App. 637 ( 1976 )
Amato v. Oxford Area Community School District No. 7 , 70 Mich. App. 305 ( 1976 )
Dryden v. Marcellus Community Schools Board of Education , 73 Mich. App. 40 ( 1976 )
Rockwell v. Crestwood School District Board of Education , 393 Mich. 616 ( 1975 )
Weckerly v. Mona Shores Board of Education , 388 Mich. 731 ( 1972 )
Kaleva-Norman-Dickson School District No. 6 v. Kalevanorman-... , 393 Mich. 583 ( 1975 )
Washtenaw County v. Saline River Intercounty Drainage Board , 80 Mich. App. 550 ( 1978 )
Holton Public Schools v. Farmer , 77 Mich. App. 765 ( 1977 )
Simmons v. Marlette Board of Education , 73 Mich. App. 1 ( 1976 )
Freiberg v. Board of Education of Big Bay De Noc School ... , 61 Mich. App. 404 ( 1975 )
Breuhan v. Plymouth-Canton Community Schools , 425 Mich. 278 ( 1986 )
Morse v. Wozniak , 398 F. Supp. 597 ( 1975 )
Lipka v. Brown City Community Schools , 399 Mich. 704 ( 1977 )
Memphis Community Schools v. Henderson , 152 Mich. App. 43 ( 1986 )