State v. Mundy

[Cite as State v. Mundy, 132 Ohio St.3d 128, 2012-Ohio-2677.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MUNDY, APPELLANT.
[Cite as State v. Mundy, 132 Ohio St.3d 128, 2012-Ohio-2677.]
Certified conflict answered in the affirmative—Court of appeals’ judgment
reversed, and cause remanded for application of State v. Harris.
(No. 2011-0838—Submitted June 6, 2012—Decided June 19, 2012.)
CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 10CA0039-M,
2011-Ohio-1207.
__________________
{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative. The
judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for
application of State v. Harris, 132 Ohio St.3d 318, 2012-Ohio-1908, ___ N.E.2d
___.
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, CUPP,
and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
LANZINGER, J., dissents.
__________________
Dean Holman, Medina County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Raymont Mundy, pro se.
______________________